Author: D C Jefferson ****************************************************************************** JPL ANALYSIS REPORT GPS-WEEK 0836 (DAYS 14-20, DATES 1996 Jan 14 - Jan 20) ****************************************************************************** Submitted by the JPL IGS/FLINN Analysis Team: J F Zumberge, D C Jefferson, M B Heflin, M M Watkins, F H Webb all at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109. Files listed below are available in Unix compressed format and can be retrieved using anonymous ftp to sideshow.jpl.nasa.gov (128.149.70.41), directory pub/jpligsac/0836. These files have also been sent to the CDDIS. ______________________________________________________________________________ filename contents ______________________________________________________________________________ jpl08367.sum This text file. jpl08367.erp Earth rotation parameters for GPS week 836. jpl08367.snx Ground station coordinates for GPS week 836, SINEX format. jpl0836[0-6].sp3 GPS ephemerides for GPS week 836, sp3 format. ______________________________________________________________________________ Mean Orbit Repeatability (see table below): 19.8 cm According to the file nanu1996.mes obtained from the IGS CBIS, PRN20 was unusable from days 015 to 017 for maintenance (no maneuver). Data from this satellite were used in our analyses of these days, and a clock reset was detected at the following approximate time: PRN20 - clock reset day 016 at 01:35 UT Satellite PRN12 is not well modeled on days 019 and 020. Its data did not meet our initial convergence criteria on these days, and were excluded from the analyses accordingly. Beginning this week, we include data from MALI (Malindi, Kenya). As with most stations, this site is given the opportunity to participate in the orbit and clock solution as the global site distribution varies. The following nominal coordinates were assumed: X (m) Y (m) Z (m) 4865366.0000 4110740.0000 -331122.0000 Due to potential problems, data from stations mentioned below were not considered for use in the global solution for the day indicated. (For geographical reasons, they may not have been used in any case.) WARNING: Data from CHIL, FAIR, KOKB, LONG, MATE, MDVO, VCIO excluded day 014. WARNING: Data from CHIL, FAIR, HART, KOKB, MATE, MCM4 excluded day 015. WARNING: Data from HART, KOKB, NYAL, TROM excluded day 016. WARNING: Data from CHIL, HART, MATE excluded day 017. WARNING: Data from CHIL, HBRK excluded day 018. WARNING: Data from PRN12, HOLP, LAMA, MDVO, PERT, TROM excluded day 019. WARNING: Data from PRN12, HOLP, MATE, MDVO, PERT, TSKB excluded day 020. In the following table, UT1R-UTC are the integrated values based on estimated LODR values in the adjacent column. See IGS Report No. 1498 (jpl07827.sum) for details: JPL ERP TABLE GPS week 836 (1996 Jan 14 - Jan 20) MJD XPole Ypole UT1R-UTC LODR Xsig Ysig UTsig LODsig Nr Nf Nt Xrt Yrt 10**-5" usec us/d 10**-5" us us/d 10**-5"/d 50096.50 -19813 23030 531602 1838 6 6 12 12 37 11 25 -156 317 50097.50 -19989 23316 529766 1834 6 6 12 12 37 10 25 -146 285 50098.50 -20079 23582 527922 1854 5 6 11 11 37 10 25 -144 306 50099.50 -20218 23859 526089 1812 5 5 11 11 37 11 25 -132 298 50100.50 -20338 24192 524312 1741 4 5 11 11 37 11 25 -131 336 50101.50 -20486 24566 522577 1730 5 5 12 12 37 12 24 -162 369 50102.50 -20642 24999 520858 1707 5 5 12 12 37 13 24 -149 331 END ERP TABLE The following table indicates the "3-dimensional orbit repeatability", as defined in IGS Mail Message 37, for GPS week 836: ["3d rss" = sqrt(xrms**2 + yrms**2 + zrms**2)] JPL ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE GPS week 836 (1996 Jan 14 - Jan 20) 96 1 14 96 1 15 96 1 16 96 1 17 96 1 18 96 1 19 96 1 20 prn 3d rss (m) 1 0.57 0.19 0.16 0.20 0.19 0.24 0.12 2 0.19 0.21 0.28 0.26 0.19 0.11 0.13 4 0.16 0.22 0.26 0.19 0.26 0.24 0.12 5 0.18 0.17 0.20 0.16 0.13 0.11 0.21 6 0.14 0.18 0.14 0.16 0.17 0.14 0.21 7 0.15 0.26 0.16 0.11 0.12 0.10 0.10 9 0.11 0.12 0.14 0.08 0.07 0.19 0.13 12 0.29 0.21 0.25 0.13 0.1 14 0.16 0.19 0.25 0.21 0.13 0.17 0.19 15 0.14 0.20 0.20 0.23 0.28 0.25 0.22 16 0.12 0.16 0.28 0.22 0.19 0.27 0.24 17 0.23 0.22 0.23 0.21 0.15 0.18 0.19 18 0.26 0.17 0.16 0.13 0.12 0.20 0.16 19 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.20 0.19 0.17 0.13 20 0.32 0.18 0.23 0.20 0.18 0.20 0.30 21 0.33 0.15 0.16 0.12 0.14 0.22 0.19 22 0.41 0.14 0.27 0.15 0.25 0.25 0.36 23 0.17 0.22 0.26 0.11 0.21 0.29 0.22 24 0.20 0.31 0.31 0.25 0.36 0.47 0.24 25 0.27 0.21 0.20 0.17 0.23 0.23 0.09 26 0.27 0.26 0.23 0.16 0.26 0.25 0.21 27 0.12 0.12 0.16 0.14 0.16 0.12 0.06 28 0.21 0.19 0.25 0.24 0.22 0.14 0.15 29 0.14 0.17 0.15 0.14 0.20 0.16 0.17 31 0.20 0.19 0.27 0.26 0.35 0.28 0.18 _______________________ END ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE The following table statistically summarizes this week's "engineering data", as described in IGS Report No. 1528: JPL ENGINEERING DATA SUMMARY TABLE GPS week 836 (1996 Jan 14 - Jan 20) receiver/transmitter (dot means point positioned, * means fiducial site) | days analyzed | | rms clock noise (ns) | | | average clock solution (us) | | | | rms pseudorange (cm) | | | | | (dot means pcode not analyzed) | | | | | rms phase (mm) | | | | | | average arc (hr) | | | | | | | |___ |__ |_______ |_______ |___ |___ |__ ALBH 5.0 2.61 51.6 38.2 3.64 2.42 ALGO* 7.0 . . 39.7 4.06 2.96 ANKR 4.0 .151e+04 -.494 58.1 4.20 2.40 AREQ 7.0 88.7 -.230 46.6 5.15 2.57 AUCK 1.0 82.8 -.261 38.0 5.00 2.91 BOR1 1.0 3.02 -1.19 39.0 3.00 3.27 BRUS 7.0 .465 1.58 61.5 3.91 2.69 CHAT 6.9 103. -.231 84.2 5.62 2.78 CRO1 7.0 138. -.229 42.4 6.95 2.12 FAI2 7.0 12.8 -.204 48.0 4.45 2.08 FAIR* 5.0 61.1 -.261 . 4.21 1.95 GODE 1.0 .775e+04 31.8 39.0 4.00 2.62 GOL2 7.0 .261 -.457 49.9 4.45 3.05 GOLD* 7.0 .278 -.387 . 3.31 2.27 GUAM 7.0 97.0 -.235 46.4 7.66 2.60 HART* 4.0 20.0 -9.52 . 8.00 1.69 HARV 4.8 .858e+07 .144e+05 69.8 5.42 2.61 IISC 6.9 163. -.224 64.3 4.87 2.11 IRKT 3.5 217. 1.60 48.5 5.00 2.48 KERG 5.9 153. -552. . 5.86 2.58 KIRU 1.0 2.83 12.1 55.0 8.00 1.86 KIT3 2.5 108. -.235 61.4 4.38 2.81 KOKB* 3.9 8.98 -.134 42.3 6.91 2.35 KOSG* 5.8 1.14 169. . 3.20 2.07 KOUR 1.0 2.95 2.43 . 10.0 2.07 LPGS 7.0 .147e+04 -.344 54.9 5.46 3.02 MADR* 6.8 .221 -1.25 . 4.16 2.33 MALI 1.9 128. -.615e+04 . 7.49 2.24 MCM4 2.0 82.5 -.277 45.0 5.53 1.68 MDO1 2.0 2.21 -.961 32.0 4.53 2.75 METS 4.8 .180 -5.13 57.4 3.24 2.11 NLIB 6.9 .215 -.728 37.1 3.61 2.65 NOTO 6.9 .186 -1.49 39.1 4.04 3.13 OHIG 4.9 .461e+05 .161 58.7 5.09 1.04 ONSA 1.9 .324 -.739 38.5 3.00 2.06 PAMA 2.6 .573e+04 -.864 . 11.1 1.86 PERT 5.0 2.76 -3.44 50.8 4.00 3.45 PIE1 4.7 124. -1.46 36.3 4.00 2.60 SANT* 7.0 .293 .256 . 5.15 2.60 SHAO 7.0 86.9 -.228 73.7 4.16 2.44 STJO 7.0 3.02 1.68 40.7 4.32 2.75 THU1 4.8 71.8 -.216 46.8 4.45 2.70 TID2 7.0 .249 .913 42.6 5.05 3.25 TIDB* 7.0 .250 1.08 . 5.06 2.75 TROM* 2.8 .173e+04 24.6 . 5.00 1.14 TSKB 1.0 .400 -10.2 46.0 4.00 2.94 USUD 7.0 255. .709 35.0 4.49 2.61 VILL 4.0 .119e+05 -52.2 64.3 4.00 2.75 WETT* 7.0 .242 2.58 . 6.60 2.41 YAR1* 7.0 3.42 .259 . 4.16 2.64 YELL* 7.0 .231 -1.02 41.3 4.30 1.86 ZWEN .9 93.1 -.258 57.0 5.00 2.40 PRN01 6.9 83.3 546. 51.9 5.30 2.45 PRN02 6.9 80.9 -225. 51.5 4.74 2.52 PRN04 7.0 79.8 6.37 47.5 5.45 2.14 PRN05 7.0 80.7 19.6 49.5 4.87 2.68 PRN06 7.0 80.6 5.02 53.0 5.15 2.43 PRN07 6.9 81.2 714. 52.9 5.18 2.15 PRN09 7.0 82.7 -8.53 54.8 4.87 2.24 PRN12 4.9 .731 -182. 55.4 4.64 2.95 PRN14 6.5 79.7 12.0 52.7 5.18 2.31 PRN15 7.0 3.70 262. 54.5 5.03 2.29 PRN16 6.8 82.4 -166. 55.0 5.45 2.09 PRN17 7.0 84.8 -104. 49.4 4.89 2.46 PRN18 7.0 79.8 -6.06 48.0 4.77 2.63 PRN19 7.0 82.0 314. 44.9 4.31 2.44 PRN20 6.6 .529e+04 23.3 52.6 4.65 2.44 PRN21 6.6 82.6 -12.5 51.6 5.30 2.37 PRN22 6.9 81.4 278. 52.0 5.59 2.16 PRN23 6.7 81.9 5.74 48.8 5.46 2.14 PRN24 7.0 80.7 196. 52.7 5.31 2.22 PRN25 6.9 82.0 -.675 51.8 5.31 2.21 PRN26 7.0 82.9 -138. 52.9 5.00 2.41 PRN27 7.0 80.9 15.7 46.1 4.60 2.64 PRN28 7.0 2.64 59.8 58.3 4.77 2.74 PRN29 7.0 81.7 5.23 47.2 4.88 2.34 PRN31 7.0 81.9 237. 49.4 4.90 2.66 _______________________ END ENGINEERING DATA SUMMARY TABLE As described in IGS Mail Message 37, the following table compares the JPL precise ephemerides with those from the broadcast ephemeris: JPL COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES 96 1 14 96 1 15 96 1 16 96 1 17 96 1 18 96 1 19 96 1 20 prn 3d rss (m) 1 3.5 3.2 2.7 3.2 3.2 3.3 2.9 2 8.2 6.4 6.1 6.5 6.9 5.8 6.6 4 3.2 4.0 4.0 3.4 2.6 2.9 3.0 5 7.2 7.5 7.8 7.5 6.4 7.9 5.3 6 6.1 5.7 4.3 5.5 4.9 6.4 6.1 7 5.4 5.1 4.3 3.9 3.9 4.1 4.1 9 5.6 6.2 6.7 6.8 5.5 6.9 6.3 12 4.3 2.4 23.0 36.4 1.6 14 5.4 6.0 5.1 5.0 5.2 5.5 5.4 15 4.7 5.4 4.8 4.1 4.9 4.2 3.8 16 5.5 5.5 5.5 5.7 7.0 7.3 5.3 17 5.0 4.6 4.4 4.5 5.1 4.8 4.3 18 4.6 3.0 3.4 3.0 3.5 3.4 3.1 19 7.8 5.8 7.6 6.7 4.4 6.7 4.7 20 6.1 6.0 5.5 4.6 5.4 5.2 5.0 21 6.7 5.8 6.3 5.3 6.2 5.2 5.5 22 5.4 4.1 6.8 6.4 4.8 7.1 5.1 23 2.6 4.0 4.6 6.2 6.8 2.2 4.3 24 2.8 3.0 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.6 3.3 25 6.9 6.7 6.6 6.2 6.8 8.0 7.4 26 5.4 4.5 3.9 4.0 4.9 5.2 4.3 27 6.2 5.1 4.0 4.3 4.4 5.0 3.8 28 3.9 2.8 2.8 3.6 4.2 4.2 3.1 29 2.2 2.7 2.6 3.2 2.8 2.8 3.2 31 3.3 2.4 2.6 3.0 3.0 2.9 3.0 _______________________ END COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES